Abiogenesis & Evolution
In the Beginning was Abiogenesis
This modern conceptualization is reasonable in view of what we now know of the demonstrable biochemical basis of all life. The modern conceptualization replaces earlier notions of "spontaneous generation" that viewed life as arising fully formed from non-living matter, or de novo. Such Aristotelian notions of archebiosis probably arose because much of life exists at the microscopic level of prokaryotes and unicellular eukaryotes, and some organisms living on detritus reach visible proportions after having been of microscopic size.
The term 'life' in relation to abiogenesis embraces the notion of utilization of energy sources to drive biochemical self-replication. This requires that an assembly of molecules and macromolecules acquired the ability to convert energy into growth and self-replication directed by informational macromolecules. A basic understanding of physical chemistry, biochemistry, biochemical energetics, and informational macromolecules is necessary to apprehend this concept.
Is the overall process depicted in the concept of abiogenesis one of pure chance? Of course not, rather the processes would have been governed by the non-random physical laws of chemistry, specifically those physical properties related to organic molecules. Since the processes involved would be widespread across the primordial planet, an enormous numbers of molecules and macromolecules would have been generated in the first 10 million years of Earth history. According to most theorists, conditions on Earth are no longer suitable for abiogenesis to occur. Abiogenesis requires a reducing environment, and oxygenic photosynthesis in Cyanobacteria converted the atmosphere to an oxidizing environment.
The exact elucidation/replication of abiogenetic mechanisms would be of enormous interest, yet this has never been a particularly active area of research because it has limited applications. The advent of space exploration has infused life into Astrobiology and the search for the Origin of Life. However, recent work, published in Nature, has demonstrated formation of activated pyrimidine nucleotides in a system consistent with early-Earth geochemical models.
Creationists, deliberately or out of ignorance, confuse the term abiogenesis with the term "evolution", which refers (in this context) to changes in the biology of living organisms over time. Creationists deceptively or mistakenly claim that evolution is not a fact. Biological evolution is a fact. That is, the fossil record and genomes demonstrate accumulated biological change over time. Denial or ignorance of a fact does not eliminate that fact.
Evolutionary theory deals with postulated mechanisms that explain the observed biological changes over time. Scientists do not claim that research on mechanisms of abiogenesis or biological evolution provide all the answers that they seek. This is not the problem that creationist love to claim it is, rather it one of the valuable features of scientific thinking. Proof exists only within mathematics, while most scientific reasearch employs empiricism and experimentation in order to disprove inaccurate theories – and thus to eliminate all but the best hypothesis. Basically, scientists seek the best possible explanation for an observed phenomenon, then move on to the next unanswered question. It is expected of scientists that they will abandon outmoded hypotheses.
Some creationists claim that evolution of biological forms cannot be explained without first accounting for the origin of life. This, like other creationist claims, is not a valid argument. The processes of abiogenesis and evolution affect two distinct areas of life. An analogy would be the construction of an automobile in a factory (origin) followed, independently of construction, by mechanical wear and tear (evolution). So, the mechanisms of biological evolution can be studied separately from the origin of life. Scientists may study the evolution of biological forms without any reference to the origin of life as assemblages of self-replicating chemicals.
From NASA's Astrobiology Institute
Spitzer Telecope Data Suggest that Life's Building Blocks are Abundant
Finding Life in Mars Analog Sites on Earth
More on Astrobiology:
Evolution and Ecology Beyond the Planet of Origin
Evolution and Development Workshop
New York Center for Studies on the Origins of Life
Ad Astra Magazine: Astrobiology Issue (January/February 1999)
The Astrobiology Web
Free audio on WAMC's Origins of Life Segments
Origins on Abiogenesis
Recommended on the Talk Origins Archive:
Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and Probability of Abiogenesis Calculations
Borel's Law and the Origin of Many Creationist Probability Assertions
Spontaneous Generation and the Origin of Life
Labels: abiogenesis, biopoiesis
| 3 Guide-GlossaryBefore the Beginning
When early Earth was cooling from its molten state, conditions would have been like hell on Earth – hence the term "hadean" for this earliest segment of the precambrian. Meteors rained down on the hot Earth, ultraviolet radiation was unchecked by an ozone belt, and volcanos belched fumes into a reducing atmosphere, which sparked with lightning. Life, of course, had not yet evolved, but it may have had an earlier start than thought previously (see below).
The term "hadean" was coined to designate the time before the earliest known rocks. However, rocks have been found that are older than the 4550-3800 Ma time-frame of the Hadean.
The oldest rocks so far discovered on Earth are:
- Jack Hills, Western Australia, a 4.4 Ga detrital zircon (sample W74) in the Jack Hills metaconglomerate, Eranondoo Hill. More at Earliest Piece of Earth
- The Acasta Gneisses near Canada’s Great Slave Lake (4.03 Ga)
- The Isua Supracrustal rocks of West Greenland (3.7 to 3.8 Ga)
- Northern Michigan (3.5-3.7 Ga)
- Swaziland (3.4-3.5 Ga)
“No known rocks have survived from the first 500 million years of Earth history, but studies of single zircons suggest that some continental crust formed as early as 4.4 Ga, 160 m.y. after accretion of the Earth, and that surface temperatures were low enough for liquid water. Surface temperatures are inferred from high d18O values of zircons. The range of d18O values is constant throughout the Archean (4.4-2.6 Ga) suggesting uniformity of processes and conditions. The hypothesis of a Cool Early Earth suggests long intervals of relatively temperate surface conditions from 4.4 to 4.0 Ga that were conducive to liquid-water oceans and possibly life. Meteorite impacts during this period may have been less frequent than previously thought.”A Cool Early Earth
More: Introduction to the Hadean / Palaeos Hadean: The Hadean Eon / Geol 2C Hadean lecture / Evolution: Change: Deep Time / Geologic Time: Age of the Earth /LUCA
A number of terms are employed to refer to the universal cenancestor – last universal ancestor (LUA), last common ancestor (LCA), or last universal common ancestor (LUCA). | 0 Guide-Glossary
Timeline of Life
Based on radio-dating of meteorites, the solar system is about 4600 Ma – 4600 million years, or 4.6 billion years old (Ga). The formation of the earth occurred 10 Ga after the Big Bang. The sun and planets condensed from a large, hot accretion disk.
The earliest atmosphere of H2 and He was lost to space, and was replaced by a reductive atmosphere with a composition probably similar to outgassing of modern volcanoes – H2O, CO2, SO2, S2, Cl2, N2, NH3, and CH4
Oxygen levels began to rise after the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis by the Cyanobacteria, which evolved at least at least 3450 million years ago (3.45 Ga) and formed the earliest microfossils as stromatolite reefs.
There is considerable evidence that the earliest eukaryotes evolved through serial endosymbiosis. Chloroplasts resulted from endosymbiotic transfers of Cyanobacteria, and mitochondria originated from endosymbiotic transfers of alpha-proteobacteria (purple bacteria). Mitochondria are the site of oxidative phosporylation in eukaryotes.
What Is Life? | 0 Guide-Glossary
CHONSP and RNA world
Miller-Urey & Beyond
It turns out that Miller’s and Urey’s guess about the composition of the primordial atmosphere was wrong, yet the Miller-Urey products and many more products (including nucleotides) have repeatedly been generated in similar experiments that more accurately replicate the early atmosphere.
The salient point is that in a very short time, a variety of life-related chemicals will generate themselves from simple molecules provided that some energy is supplied to the system. Considering the billions of years before recognizable life appeared on the entire planet, it is clear that chemical evolution could yield cellular life. In fact, the earliest discovered microfossils date from about 3 ½ billion years ago, and this is a minimum 1 billion years since the origin of the planet.
Similar processes to those above must be occurring in the energy-riddled immensity of space, because many organic compounds have been identified spectroscopically in space and have been found in meteorites. | 0 Guide-Glossary
The evolution of the prebiotic atmosphere
James F. Kasting
The evolution of the prebiotic atmosphere
Kasting, J. E. Origins of Life 14, 75−82 (1984). | 0 Guide-Glossary
Primordial Soup : Theories
1. A reducing atmosphere from volcanic outgassing,
2. High-temperature submarine vents and fumaroles -- black smokers, and
3.Space--for example, the 4.6 billion-year-old Murchison meteorite, discovered in Australia in 1969 was loaded with amino acids, aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, hydroxy acids, purines, pyrimidines, and other chemical building blocks of life.
'The evidence strongly suggests that prior to the origin of life the primitive Earth already had many different catalytic agents, polymers with sequences of nucleotides, and membrane-forming compounds,' Lazcano concluded. This prebiotic soup led to a catalytic and replicative RNA world, which led to the DNA world of today."
See: Synthesis of activated pyrimidine ribonucleotides in prebiotically plausible conditions | 0 Guide-Glossary